So, now that we have cause to wonder if maybe it isn’t about a high powered round, rather, a round that has excellent design for damage and trauma in order to stop a hostile. Heck, depending on who you ask, calling an AR-15 “better” is also a stretch. Also don’t buy an M1A, please do not support Springfield Armory for god sake they helped ruin every gun dealer in Ohio, they thought only five transfers a year was a great idea. I did that just to be safe and it cost me like 10$ to do, so its a poor argument. Disregarding AKs as legitimate rely on weapons is like disregarding Jeep as the rulers of the crawl. You might consider doing some research before commenting next time smart @$$. So calling BS on that. The only thing in my opinion that the SKS has is range. Another feature of both rifles that compromises accuracy is the piston over the barrel, which directs the recoil upward and to the rear of the rifle. Likely they would have more than one of the same rifle with different loadouts in order to have the capability to optimize their technological edge to supplement the skills they have. I have a few, not to mention the ones I plan to purchase asap. Old article I know, but feel the need to point out the VZ-58 is a blend of these two platforms, and probably one of (if not the) most well thought out military rifle ever designed. Firepower. As for my cheek weld, on both rifles it's behind the top cover but close enough to the top cover that I don't want a cheap part to fail and send the bolt carrier into my face. I promise you, the cheapest made Chinese SKS is superior to any AK out there. All the proof I need is in the numbers. Comes with lower rail or bayonet groove. Sure, in that case, you can see them for miles. … And your other friend was beating a guy with a pistol and then finally got the barrel pointed at him? It has greater ease of use and maintenance, and is THE MOST prolific firearm on Earth…so smoke on that one. It was a “high performance” craft, for sure, and it was light, but in the end, after 10 years of hard running, it was spent. cdn. It can be field stripped in less than 1/3 the time, replacement parts are beyond abundant, and a person with zero knowledge of the gun could reassemble one in no time. The first rifle i ever bought. I will be picking up an AK74 with wrist brace, also Russian 7.62 so now I am sharing my own ammo. I think anyone should own and shoot what you like, but the SKS just makes sense to me. They may have cosmoline or other oils on them and will need to be cleaned. And if you are really feeling it you can try getting a full auto license and get that 3rd pin installed in your receiver to make it full auto…if you got $$ to spend..plus you can tacticool and AK with sights and rails/handguards…not the sks. How dumb can you be? Wanna bet who wins? There is ALWAYS a tradeoff. You have entered an incorrect email address! No, Its called smart, and smart people will live longer then you macho men… Accuracy is more important then how fast you fill the air with lead. Its a decent deer rifle.The one I own has bayonet,I use this as a bipod, thing I dont like with any semi auto is they are harder to clean then bolt actions. I believe the SKS may be one of the most under appreciated rifles of the modern era. Sure, it’s the sweetest, lightest, smoothest thing in town; that is until the parts start to wear out, …….. and a lot more of their parts WILL wear out, and a lot faster than the SKS. 9) In Nam, when dirty M16s were failing, US troops grabbed the VC’s AKs, and used them with no cleaning or maintenance. id like to see this mysterious “ambidextrious safety” on the SKS. My next rifle and probably last for a while is going to be a Styer Aug. Most likely they would have multiple of each preferred everywhere they go rifle. What is this “class 3 license”? There are lots of rifles with milled receivers that do not crack, and some of them (like the M-1 Garand) have been around a lot longer than any milled AK. However, I disagree with you, fundamentally. I use Tapco 20 round detachable mags, but they have their problems and need to be slightly modified for more reliable feeding. You will love it. Lets see you do that. In the long run, in a long term SHTF scenario, I think the SKS will outlast the AR simply out of durability. Hello Martin- The top cover on the Ak does not hold the bolt carrier in place at all- in fact, the "button" holding the top cover on is at the back of the recoil spring lug, nesting in a slot at the rear of the receiver- you can fire the ak all day long without the top cover, although the reciprocation of the bolt and carrier would be very distracting- for ultimate safety in a shoulder-fired weapon, a Mauser 98 would be hard to beat(see, now you have every reason to acquire more guns-heh!) Not to be facetious, it sounds like you’re the Rambo here. It was designed for SLOW, accurate fire, NOT full-on assault. I simply wanted to point out how wrong most of you were about the sks. An SKS, however, does it’s job and does it well. The one advantage of using stamped sheet metal receives on the AK (besides cost) is weight. The average person can’t tell them apart from a Dragunov which has a shorter gas piston, resulting in less felt recoil. The majority of your statement would be laughable here because if you buy a scope more than roughly 5x, you must be going sightseeing cause where are you looking in the woods that you can’t see what’s there with bare eyes or a couple magnifics? No cleaning kit inside the butt stock but everything else is there. The remainder is IDENTICAL to a full-auto example. or less so Canadians really like them. I’ve owned both AK’s and SKS’ and I now only have a couple of SKS’. You can carry so much more ammo in stripper clips. In the US, I would consider taking an ak47 especially in an urban area, because there are so much guns in the US. Again, all one needs to do to close this case is this: # of SKS rifles built worldwide: 15,000,000 Finding the time and actual effort to produce a great article… but what can I say… I put things off a lot and don’t manage to get nearly anything done.|. Norinco SKS has one of the most difficult-to-find manufacturing dates of all the SKS rifles. Gun Review: Norinco SKS. In thinking like a prepper the SKS cant be beat. So roughly you can figure that there are enough guns for half of the population. “2) The ease of maintenance on an AK is far greater, and AKs have far less failures in battle.” Compared to what? Secondly, referring to integrity of the materials, when 200+ pound guys are doing pushups on their AK’s, or hanging a pair on a bar and doing pullups with them, the structural integrity of the magazines and receiver are of no concern to me. In fact, reloading the SKS with stripper clips is easy. I had to stop reading when it said that the sheet metal top cover is where you put your cheek when you shoot it. The f***ing title of article states the SKS is “better.” Better than what, a 10-rd 99.1 Romak, maybe? After lots of practice, I can perform a mag change with my SLR-107 in about 2 to 2.5 seconds (and I’ve seen faster). Maybe an RPK or heavy-barreled AK, but not most of the common AKs, which avg 7.7 lbs. I own both and I think any AK enthusiasts would be an enthusiast of the SKS as well. Not that the SKS is a bad rifle, it’s just obsolete as a military weapon. Easier to work on than what? You can create loadouts for it that will supplement your skills nicely so as to have that edge a hostile may not. Worse yet, the AKs (even the milled-receiver versions) have a tinny, cheap, stamped upper cover – you know, the part you put your cheek against when you shoot. Russian-made ones have milled receivers. SKS better the any other, maintenance, oil and good cleanig routine and there all just fine. For instance a 10-round fixed magazine is just fine if you're at the range shooting targets but is a HUGE disadvantage if you're in a three-gun competition (a common civilian sport). The author obviously has zero experience with the AK platform; and furthermore, is totally myopic about his beloved SKS. The safety has never been a problem yet I keep the thing pointed in a safe direction. You start out with minimal accuracy and after a mag goes through its so hot you lose more..tje only reason that the am is abundant is because of price..easy to make cheap ..as for longevity.another bullshit myth..they were out ..govt gives you new one..that simple. What really irks me isn’t your absolute confidence that you will survive and know what you are talking about but that you are so judgmental and less helpful and more “Stupid peasants, you will not survive the coming apocalypse, only those of us worthy shall, you wannabe Rambos…”. To me they are a semi auto Winchester 94, not quite as powerful but close. As for any argument comparing SKS to AK, whatever works for you. You might carry two. Look on Wikipedia for a list of countries currently deploying AKs…it’s WAY over 60. The AK is not as accurate but you can spray more without reloading slso the clip comes out. Also, how few shots you have to make. An AK with even minimal maintenance is regarded as one of the MOST (if not THE most) reliable firearms on Earth, period. Don’t get me wrong – the SKS is a wonderful firearm. The rear sight of both rifles is in front of the bolt greatly shortening the distance between the front and rear sight. These are getting harder and harder to find. A good semi auto rifle, and a good pump shotgun. You will want what shoots the most common ammo available, or be willing to carry a lot of ammo. For anyone that didn窶冲 grab a gun before now, ithe SKS should not be overlooked. Unless you’re counting rounds or using the last-round-is-a-tracer trick, the only way you know you’re out of ammo is when you pull the trigger and hear a dull “click” instead of a robust “bang!” When you’re fighting off Zombies, that can be downright embarrassing. “3) The SKS was never designed to accept a high-cap magazine, and the rifles are not made for continuous fire like an AK.” True, but irrelevant. I have a neighbor that has approximately 35-40 arms (rifles, pistols & shotguns) and over 10,000 rounds of ammo for all calibers, yet he has zero food, water, medical supplies, etc. The AK (now AKM) is what you want in modern combat, anything outside combat and revolutionary thinking can be done with an SKS. The safety is another huge difference. Forged in the hell of WW2 they designed it to go to hell with, and it has proven it can go to heaven and hades again and again. Though, you could just put a NATO length stock on it. 100 MILLION AK users can’t be wrong, sir. Now, Mike, I just want to say that how you prepare and plan to handle a situation is up to you. If you have problems with stamped parts, forget about the H&K G3 and the FN SCAR or any other rifle that uses stamped steel or aluminum parts. In every measurable category. Of course, none of these factors apply to the US civilian market.
Is Pokey Bear Sick, Dappled Boer Goats For Sale In Oklahoma, Blade And Sorcery Mod Weapons Not Working, Folding Tv Tray, Bishop, Ca Air Quality, Granite Mountain Hotshots Statue, Shisui Unlock Ff14, The Mind, Explained Episode 5, Black Panther Movie Symbolism, Clone Troopers Vs Stormtroopers, Houses For Rent In Tyler, Tx Near Tjc,